The real experience
Screens, conversations, timing and the path taken.
We arrive as a real customer, try to understand, buy and solve a problem. Then we sit down with you and show what actually happened.
Screens, conversations, timing and the path taken.
The reproducible failure and its commercial or operational consequence.
Priority, recommended correction, suggested owner and retest.
We align on the question that needs an answer.
Channels, identities, timing and allowed actions are recorded.
People run the test; technology organizes the evidence.
You understand what happened, the impact and the correction order.
We walk one public journey and present up to three verifiable failures. The final conversation shows whether a broader scope makes sense.
Choose it when: When risk lives in the handoffs between marketing, sales, delivery, support and cancellation.
Choose it when: When leadership needs a cross-functional view and a prioritized correction plan.
Choose it when: When frequent change requires continuous observation and historical evidence.
We found problems sitting in plain sight, fixed them and ran the test again.
Mixed brands, unclear privacy and conflicting information.
We unified identity, clarified privacy and removed inconsistencies.
The new journey went through another review before closure.
Internal case completed on August 9, 2026. Valid only for the tested scope and version.
Open the sample report →Portuguese sample based on GRXK’s internal test, with case data anonymized.
Ellen coordinates the test, speaks with your team and owns the final reading. AI works behind the scenes to organize timelines, compare channels and identify patterns. Sensitive decisions remain under human responsibility.
Yes, when the scope authorizes it. We use test identities and clear rules within the permitted access.
The security module has its own formal authorization, targets, window and boundaries. The free test focuses on the public journey.
The delivery brings together the journey, evidence, reproducible failure, impact, recommended correction and retest.
It organizes evidence and compares patterns. People conduct sensitive interactions and present the conclusion.
Tell us what is happening. Ellen makes the first review and replies with a public, free and clearly scoped test.